![]() ![]() The rclone config contents with secrets removed. Rclone mount -fuse-flag -VolumePrefix=\GDFS_Encrypted\Pantheon -allow-other -use-mmap GDFS-crypt: G: Rclone mount -fuse-flag -VolumePrefix=\GDFS_Encrypted\Pantheon -allow-other GDFS-crypt: G: Rclone mount -allow-other -use-mmap GDFS-crypt: G: Has occurred with the following variations, run manually and as a service: rclone mount -allow-other GDFS-crypt: G: The command you were trying to run (eg rclone copy /tmp remote:tmp) Which cloud storage system are you using? (eg Google Drive) Rclone is situated on a primary ssd and files are being transferred from a Windows (parity) Storage Space of several conventional drives. Which OS you are using and how many bits (eg Windows 7, 64 bit) I've been reading rclone dot org/drive and bytesized-hosting dot com/pages/rclone-gdrive What is your rclone version (output from rclone version) I could be using GoodSync for this task but much prefer relying on rclone's encryption in the long run. Both unencrypted and encrypted by GoodSync. GoodSync is able to interact perfectly fine with the same Google Drive when it's selected specifically as that, and rclone is out of the picture. Throwing in the computer's actual name as the server name causes a long delay before failing as well. The latter doesn't work at all due to I believe the fake \server. ![]() GoodSync allows me to select the mount as a destination as either a local drive or network share. Progress is seemingly made on and off in these programs but very little as they bounce between error to error. I believe it occurs under load, when being continuously utilised both by GoodSync and FreeFileSync. This occurs with both a standard mount and network share mount. Opening the path at this point results in a significant delay before eventually opening properly and the disk being recognised with its correct label. I have a G Suite account's Google Drive mounted that frequently fails, i.e. GoodSync and FreeFileSync repeatedly report "Incorrect function", "The parameter is incorrect", "Cannot rename temp file to destination file: The system cannot find the file specified". Is that the correct option for me? With regards to interface, I would have preferred a Plug-in, but that's just a personal preference.What is the problem you are having with rclone? I think I can infer what the difference is, but what is the significance of them and why do I need options? I'm running "pool file" duplication now. I also miss knowing that Folder A is 600GB and Folder B is 400GB and so on.Ğven after finding that little pyramid, I was confronted by "Pool File" and "Folder" duplication options. I miss knowing that Folder A is distributed on Drive 2 and Drive 3, and that folder B is distributed. 1.x had the two disk and folder screens that made it very obvious where the storage capacity was being used. Specifically:Īs I mentioned earlier, there wasn't adequate indication that duplication was off. 2.x discussion although I can see how my original post may have done that, but to see if some of the 1.x functionality and reporting could be added into 2.x. ![]() Oops, it wasn't my intention to turn this into a 1.x vs. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |